Ports TO PS3 Stink.

Once again, my previous suspicion was proven correct, as after a
friend had discovered a specific trailer for Dice's Battlefield 3
showed supposed PS3 was debunked, it was announced that the port was
actually sub-HD resolution, proving that 3rd party need to stop
bragging or lying about their PS3 coding skills.

In one of my earliest posts, I warned of this happening, and thanks to
a colleague debunking my latest vid on it, which in I was a little too
optimistic, reality struck me AND everyone else poised to get this
game on a PS3, and that is it's only really worth getting on PC
instead if you have the rig for it.

Utter fail, Dice, and utter fail, I, for even falling into your hype
for even a second.

Dice, You're Next!

After the debacle that was Crytek's claims about the PS3 version of Crysis 2 being superior blowing up in everyone's faces, it has made me think: Why must Third Parties lie about knowing how to handle the PS3? It's always the same rhetoric, about using the PS3 to the max, and in the end, doesn't even look good as Uncharted 1 from 2007.

BF3's Dice is the next developer with such claims as using 4D (Defferred) Rendering and Shading on all the SPE's along with Morphological Anti Aliasing (MLAA) on, basically going the Guerrilla Games/Killzone Route, but can THEY, a Third Party bring that same quality to a PS3 version of a Multi-plat?

Obviously, the PC version is the superior version, but the comparison will be the console versions, and more specifically, the PS3 version. It's about time PS3 owners stop taking in empty promises and start demanding results. It's now up to Dice to stop spraying it, and start bringing it, and that goes for ALL Third Parties in the future.

We're watching you Dice, like a hawk.